Comments on: Romney ad “misleading”; McCain responds

by: neil

Sat, 29 Dec 2007 21:02:32 +0000

Negative campaigning. Lying. Debating what the definition of “saw” is. Who does that sound like?

You’re right, he is the true successor to Bush.

by: cbs

Sat, 29 Dec 2007 16:17:29 +0000

Sampo,

Soren did not link to the Mickey Kaus page where Kaus found that “Romney’s right about McCain. Don’t tell the MSM.” Kaus said that the NY Times, which used the same arguments as factcheck.org, were incorrect.

Everything in the Romney ad was accurate. Regardless of Soren’s unhinged dislike of Romney, the facts are on Romney’s side in this instance. I think he should acknowledge he was wrong.

by: ee2793

Sat, 29 Dec 2007 13:18:27 +0000

These are comparison TV ads, not position papers. For heaven’s sake, Soren, are you that simple-minded?

by: sampo

Sat, 29 Dec 2007 09:43:11 +0000

Check out Slick Willard’s attack ad!

Mitt Romney “opposes amnesty for illegal immigrants.”
Source?
-Romney, Strategy for a Stronger America.

No wonder McCain says Romney needs to repect voters before he can expect them to earn his.

CBS, take a chill. Soren linked to the exact same page Slate did in factcheck.org which concludes “Romney’s latest ad attacks McCain in New Hampshire with false and misleading claims”

But I digress. Unlike me, McCain didn’t resort to haggling over symantics and instead delivered a serious blow right where it hurts: Mitt’s integrity. That’s why he’s a better man than I.

by: cbs

Sat, 29 Dec 2007 07:29:28 +0000

Mickey Kaus actually did some fact checking himself and found that, lo and behold, the so called fact checkers were wrong: http://www.slate.com/id/2180876/

Care to revise and extend your remarks?