http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/12/12/national-review-endorses-romney/ Covering the 2008 election Sun, 23 Nov 2008 14:53:47 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5 http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/12/12/national-review-endorses-romney/#comment-39740 Thu, 20 Dec 2007 03:50:02 +0000 http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/12/12/national-review-endorses-romney/#comment-39740 [...] This shines an important light on National Review’s endorsement of Mitt Romney, which I discussed previously. They had a conference call today to defend it. I didn’t hear a single supportive question, and no one spoke up in favor of their endorsement. Ari Richter of the Concord Monitor asked why so little discussion of foreign policy twice. The first time, Rich Lowry responded that all the candidates were pretty similar. They shared the same views, so the only differences are execution. [...] […] This shines an important light on National Review’s endorsement of Mitt Romney, which I discussed previously. They had a conference call today to defend it. I didn’t hear a single supportive question, and no one spoke up in favor of their endorsement. Ari Richter of the Concord Monitor asked why so little discussion of foreign policy twice. The first time, Rich Lowry responded that all the candidates were pretty similar. They shared the same views, so the only differences are execution. […]

]]> http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/12/12/national-review-endorses-romney/#comment-39412 Sat, 15 Dec 2007 18:49:45 +0000 http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/12/12/national-review-endorses-romney/#comment-39412 Do you really think that it is insubstantial that National Review basically didn't talk about national security during a war? Do you really think that it is insubstantial that National Review basically didn’t talk about national security during a war?

]]> http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/12/12/national-review-endorses-romney/#comment-39239 Sat, 15 Dec 2007 02:39:24 +0000 http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/12/12/national-review-endorses-romney/#comment-39239 Soren v. National Review. I wonder whose side 99 44/100ths% of all Republicans will be on? Soren v. National Review. I wonder whose side 99 44/100ths% of all Republicans will be on?

]]>