<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: National Review endorses Romney</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sorendayton.com/2007/12/12/national-review-endorses-romney/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sorendayton.com/2007/12/12/national-review-endorses-romney/</link>
	<description>Merely an aggregation of a dispersed life online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 06:08:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: eyeon08.com &#187; McCain, Putin, and why experience matters</title>
		<link>http://sorendayton.com/2007/12/12/national-review-endorses-romney/comment-page-1/#comment-779</link>
		<dc:creator>eyeon08.com &#187; McCain, Putin, and why experience matters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 03:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/12/12/national-review-endorses-romney/#comment-779</guid>
		<description>[...] This shines an important light on National Review&#8217;s endorsement of Mitt Romney, which I discussed previously. They had a conference call today to defend it. I didn&#8217;t hear a single supportive question, and no one spoke up in favor of their endorsement. Ari Richter of the Concord Monitor asked why so little discussion of foreign policy twice. The first time, Rich Lowry responded that all the candidates were pretty similar. They shared the same views, so the only differences are execution. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This shines an important light on National Review&#8217;s endorsement of Mitt Romney, which I discussed previously. They had a conference call today to defend it. I didn&#8217;t hear a single supportive question, and no one spoke up in favor of their endorsement. Ari Richter of the Concord Monitor asked why so little discussion of foreign policy twice. The first time, Rich Lowry responded that all the candidates were pretty similar. They shared the same views, so the only differences are execution. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eye</title>
		<link>http://sorendayton.com/2007/12/12/national-review-endorses-romney/comment-page-1/#comment-778</link>
		<dc:creator>eye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 18:49:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/12/12/national-review-endorses-romney/#comment-778</guid>
		<description>Do you really think that it is insubstantial that National Review basically didn&#039;t talk about national security during a war?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you really think that it is insubstantial that National Review basically didn&#8217;t talk about national security during a war?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ee2793</title>
		<link>http://sorendayton.com/2007/12/12/national-review-endorses-romney/comment-page-1/#comment-777</link>
		<dc:creator>ee2793</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 02:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/12/12/national-review-endorses-romney/#comment-777</guid>
		<description>Soren v. National Review.  I wonder whose side 99 44/100ths% of all Republicans will be on?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Soren v. National Review.  I wonder whose side 99 44/100ths% of all Republicans will be on?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
