<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama&#8217;s troop levels</title>
	<link>http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/09/12/obamas-troop-levels/</link>
	<description>Covering the 2008 election</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 01:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: neil</title>
		<link>http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/09/12/obamas-troop-levels/#comment-35782</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 12:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/09/12/obamas-troop-levels/#comment-35782</guid>
					<description>As it turns out, it goes beyond not being in touch with their base: &lt;a href="http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/9/17/2261/46758" rel="nofollow"&gt;they are openly contemptuous of their base&lt;/a&gt;. Somehow I just can't visualize John Boehner telling a blogger that he's mad at the base because they keep asking for lower taxes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As it turns out, it goes beyond not being in touch with their base: <a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&q=http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/9/17/2261/46758" rel="nofollow">they are openly contemptuous of their base</a>. Somehow I just can&#8217;t visualize John Boehner telling a blogger that he&#8217;s mad at the base because they keep asking for lower taxes.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: eye</title>
		<link>http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/09/12/obamas-troop-levels/#comment-35573</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 18:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/09/12/obamas-troop-levels/#comment-35573</guid>
					<description>I should add that force protection will require more MPs. So some combat forces will be replaced by MPs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should add that force protection will require more MPs. So some combat forces will be replaced by MPs.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: eye</title>
		<link>http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/09/12/obamas-troop-levels/#comment-35572</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 17:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/09/12/obamas-troop-levels/#comment-35572</guid>
					<description>My point is a political one. I don't think that, in the end, if Romney is the nominee, that is going to be that much of a difference from Romney.

McCain and Giuliani are different. And God only knows where Thompson is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My point is a political one. I don&#8217;t think that, in the end, if Romney is the nominee, that is going to be that much of a difference from Romney.</p>
<p>McCain and Giuliani are different. And God only knows where Thompson is.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: neil</title>
		<link>http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/09/12/obamas-troop-levels/#comment-35571</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 17:51:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/09/12/obamas-troop-levels/#comment-35571</guid>
					<description>On that Petraeus chart it appears that over 100,000 troops are in combat roles. Hardly a 'limited number.' And even granting that point, "begin to withdraw troops now" is fundamentally different from "do not begin to withdraw troops until later."

I take your point that neither of these two options overlap with "remove all troops soon" which is what the anti-war left wants, though. I just don't think it's going to make much of a difference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On that Petraeus chart it appears that over 100,000 troops are in combat roles. Hardly a &#8216;limited number.&#8217; And even granting that point, &#8220;begin to withdraw troops now&#8221; is fundamentally different from &#8220;do not begin to withdraw troops until later.&#8221;</p>
<p>I take your point that neither of these two options overlap with &#8220;remove all troops soon&#8221; which is what the anti-war left wants, though. I just don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s going to make much of a difference.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: eye</title>
		<link>http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/09/12/obamas-troop-levels/#comment-35570</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 17:38:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/09/12/obamas-troop-levels/#comment-35570</guid>
					<description>The Petraeus proposal is to withdraw troops too.

My point is that "combat troops" is a very limited number. And he has made it clear that he is totaling a pretty small number of people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Petraeus proposal is to withdraw troops too.</p>
<p>My point is that &#8220;combat troops&#8221; is a very limited number. And he has made it clear that he is totaling a pretty small number of people.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: sampo</title>
		<link>http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/09/12/obamas-troop-levels/#comment-35569</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 17:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/09/12/obamas-troop-levels/#comment-35569</guid>
					<description>"If Romney is the nominee, which is, at least, very plausible, what are the Democrats going to do if they can’t differentiate on Iraq?"

Americans have more faith in Dems on every issue except the war on terror/national security. When Chris Wallace essentially accused Romney of being to the left of Clinton on Iraq he didn't fully reject it. Bottom line, if Clinton and Romney's Iraq plans are the same, Hillary wins. Let alone if Romney truly is to the left of her.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If Romney is the nominee, which is, at least, very plausible, what are the Democrats going to do if they can’t differentiate on Iraq?&#8221;</p>
<p>Americans have more faith in Dems on every issue except the war on terror/national security. When Chris Wallace essentially accused Romney of being to the left of Clinton on Iraq he didn&#8217;t fully reject it. Bottom line, if Clinton and Romney&#8217;s Iraq plans are the same, Hillary wins. Let alone if Romney truly is to the left of her.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: neil</title>
		<link>http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/09/12/obamas-troop-levels/#comment-35568</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 16:58:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/09/12/obamas-troop-levels/#comment-35568</guid>
					<description>Is this for real? You want to know how different it is really?

Obama wants to "immediately begin to remove our combat troops. Not in six months or one year -- now." Petraeus wants to eventually begin to remove some combat troops starting no sooner than six months from now and possibly later.

That's pretty different, if you ask me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this for real? You want to know how different it is really?</p>
<p>Obama wants to &#8220;immediately begin to remove our combat troops. Not in six months or one year &#8212; now.&#8221; Petraeus wants to eventually begin to remove some combat troops starting no sooner than six months from now and possibly later.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s pretty different, if you ask me.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.395 seconds -->
