<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pressing the flesh versus enhancing contact with technology</title>
	<link>http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/06/07/pressing-the-flesh-versus-enhancing-contact-with-technology/</link>
	<description>Covering the 2008 election</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 01:03:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Patrick Ruffini :: Running Word of Web Campaigns</title>
		<link>http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/06/07/pressing-the-flesh-versus-enhancing-contact-with-technology/#comment-34722</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 22:43:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/06/07/pressing-the-flesh-versus-enhancing-contact-with-technology/#comment-34722</guid>
					<description>[...] Justin Hart is still saying the blogosphere is not all it&#8217;s cracked up to be in terms of reaching voters. But again I have to channel Soren on this: that&#8217;s a straw man. No one is saying that the average voter is reading blogs. At best, online is their primary news source &#8212; but it&#8217;s still the early adopters (maybe the top 1-2 million of the primary electorate) who check blogs even occasionally. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Justin Hart is still saying the blogosphere is not all it&#8217;s cracked up to be in terms of reaching voters. But again I have to channel Soren on this: that&#8217;s a straw man. No one is saying that the average voter is reading blogs. At best, online is their primary news source &#8212; but it&#8217;s still the early adopters (maybe the top 1-2 million of the primary electorate) who check blogs even occasionally. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: jbonham76</title>
		<link>http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/06/07/pressing-the-flesh-versus-enhancing-contact-with-technology/#comment-34640</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 03:16:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/06/07/pressing-the-flesh-versus-enhancing-contact-with-technology/#comment-34640</guid>
					<description>That was me who wrote that Rachel. Glad your reading our blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was me who wrote that Rachel. Glad your reading our blog.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Patrick Ruffini :: What&#8217;s the Online Universe?</title>
		<link>http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/06/07/pressing-the-flesh-versus-enhancing-contact-with-technology/#comment-34639</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 03:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/06/07/pressing-the-flesh-versus-enhancing-contact-with-technology/#comment-34639</guid>
					<description>[...] MyManMitt&#8217;s Justin Hart and the Eye are engaged in a debate over whether Fred Thompson (or a candidate like him) can win using the Internet. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] MyManMitt&#8217;s Justin Hart and the Eye are engaged in a debate over whether Fred Thompson (or a candidate like him) can win using the Internet. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Rachel</title>
		<link>http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/06/07/pressing-the-flesh-versus-enhancing-contact-with-technology/#comment-34617</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 22:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/06/07/pressing-the-flesh-versus-enhancing-contact-with-technology/#comment-34617</guid>
					<description>I think he is also the one who wrote that Fred helps Romney by hurting Rudy.
I hope they keep telling themselves that...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think he is also the one who wrote that Fred helps Romney by hurting Rudy.<br />
I hope they keep telling themselves that&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.367 seconds -->
