<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More lies from Romneybots</title>
	<link>http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/03/27/more-lies-from-romneybots/</link>
	<description>Covering the 2008 election</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 00:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Games Ron Paul Supporters Play at Blog P.I.</title>
		<link>http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/03/27/more-lies-from-romneybots/#comment-30907</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 13:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/03/27/more-lies-from-romneybots/#comment-30907</guid>
					<description>[...] In few communities has the outsize influence of the Ronbots (borrowing more from &#8220;Romneybot&#8221; than &#8220;Rahmbot&#8221; here) has been felt more than fast-rising social news website Digg. Digg is a prize target for manipulators &#8212; getting listed on the front page all but guarantees a tidal wave of traffic headed toward the submitted link. After repeated revisions to the algorithm, it apparently remains no less vulnerable. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] In few communities has the outsize influence of the Ronbots (borrowing more from &#8220;Romneybot&#8221; than &#8220;Rahmbot&#8221; here) has been felt more than fast-rising social news website Digg. Digg is a prize target for manipulators &#8212; getting listed on the front page all but guarantees a tidal wave of traffic headed toward the submitted link. After repeated revisions to the algorithm, it apparently remains no less vulnerable. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: race42008.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Bloggers Gone Wild</title>
		<link>http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/03/27/more-lies-from-romneybots/#comment-12997</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 13:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/03/27/more-lies-from-romneybots/#comment-12997</guid>
					<description>[...] A little later Eye on 08’s Soren Dayton posted this: People say that a picture is worth a thousand words. I would assume that a moving picture is worth even more. But that does not stop &#8220;My Man Mitt&#8221; Jason Bonham from dishonestly misquoting one of the YouTubes that I took of John McCain this weekend in New Hampshire… [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] A little later Eye on 08’s Soren Dayton posted this: People say that a picture is worth a thousand words. I would assume that a moving picture is worth even more. But that does not stop &#8220;My Man Mitt&#8221; Jason Bonham from dishonestly misquoting one of the YouTubes that I took of John McCain this weekend in New Hampshire… [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: eyeon08.com &#187; More on McCain and campaign finance</title>
		<link>http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/03/27/more-lies-from-romneybots/#comment-12973</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 12:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/03/27/more-lies-from-romneybots/#comment-12973</guid>
					<description>[...] Yesterday, I criticized an egregious misquoting (turns out the misquoting was not original. Derrida and Searle would be proud of a bunch of conservatives arguing about the authorship of Jason quoting Human Events quoting McCain quoting the Supreme Court&#8230;) of one of the YouTubes that Matt Lewis and I took on the Straight Talk Express. Matt pushed back, saying: In my view, Soren is being too hard on MyManMitt. Yes, technically McCain was misquoted &#8212; but not misrepresented.&#160; It&#160;is clear that McCain agrees with the courts &#8212; that&#8217;s why he is quoting them. In my view, this is a matter of semantics (and not worth flaming somebody over). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Yesterday, I criticized an egregious misquoting (turns out the misquoting was not original. Derrida and Searle would be proud of a bunch of conservatives arguing about the authorship of Jason quoting Human Events quoting McCain quoting the Supreme Court&#8230;) of one of the YouTubes that Matt Lewis and I took on the Straight Talk Express. Matt pushed back, saying: In my view, Soren is being too hard on MyManMitt. Yes, technically McCain was misquoted &#8212; but not misrepresented.&nbsp; It&nbsp;is clear that McCain agrees with the courts &#8212; that&#8217;s why he is quoting them. In my view, this is a matter of semantics (and not worth flaming somebody over). [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: CosmoReaxer</title>
		<link>http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/03/27/more-lies-from-romneybots/#comment-12759</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 02:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/03/27/more-lies-from-romneybots/#comment-12759</guid>
					<description>I fail to see why this is a lie. Far be it from me to side with the so-called RomneyBots -- I kinda like that term, though I'm not sure it applies here -- but doesn't it sound like McCain is agreeing with the courts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I fail to see why this is a lie. Far be it from me to side with the so-called RomneyBots &#8212; I kinda like that term, though I&#8217;m not sure it applies here &#8212; but doesn&#8217;t it sound like McCain is agreeing with the courts?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: More lies from Multiple Choice Mitt &#171; Greg Prince&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/03/27/more-lies-from-romneybots/#comment-12720</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 00:43:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/03/27/more-lies-from-romneybots/#comment-12720</guid>
					<description>[...] Posted by Greg on March 27th, 2007  Read about it HERE. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Posted by Greg on March 27th, 2007  Read about it HERE. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.360 seconds -->
