<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Explaining Brownback on the war</title>
	<link>http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/01/12/explaining-brownback-on-the-war/</link>
	<description>Covering the 2008 election</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 03:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: eyeon08.com &#187; Two new Iraq talking points?</title>
		<link>http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/01/12/explaining-brownback-on-the-war/#comment-35935</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 14:11:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/01/12/explaining-brownback-on-the-war/#comment-35935</guid>
					<description>[...] Sam Brownback, the other half of Biden-Brownback, is counting on Republican activists being less pro-war than public opinion holds. There is polling evidence to support this. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Sam Brownback, the other half of Biden-Brownback, is counting on Republican activists being less pro-war than public opinion holds. There is polling evidence to support this. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: eyeon08.com &#187; Interesting new IA poll: They don&#8217;t like Iraq</title>
		<link>http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/01/12/explaining-brownback-on-the-war/#comment-16851</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 18:39:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/01/12/explaining-brownback-on-the-war/#comment-16851</guid>
					<description>[...] I have argued for a while that the Iowa GOP is more anti-war than other states. This would also explain Mitt Romney&#8217;s recent flip-flop on Iraq. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] I have argued for a while that the Iowa GOP is more anti-war than other states. This would also explain Mitt Romney&#8217;s recent flip-flop on Iraq. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: eyeon08.com &#187; Duncan Hunter attacks Romney over Iraq plan</title>
		<link>http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/01/12/explaining-brownback-on-the-war/#comment-16464</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 22:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/01/12/explaining-brownback-on-the-war/#comment-16464</guid>
					<description>[...] Has Mitt Romney joined his father as one of the rare &#34;peace candidates&#34; in a GOP primary? Is he trying to suck up Chuck Hagel&#8217;s space? Or does he just think that Sam Brownback might have been on to something? In any case, Duncan Hunter found his prey and is attacking: &#34;Romney is absolutely wrong in recommending a secret timetable,&#34; Rep. Duncan Hunter, R-Calif., tells ABC News in a telephone interview while campaigning in Cedar Rapids, Iowa. &#34;Secret timetables are bad because in the end they all become public and the enemy uses them to estimate the limit on America&#8217;s endurance.&#34; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Has Mitt Romney joined his father as one of the rare &quot;peace candidates&quot; in a GOP primary? Is he trying to suck up Chuck Hagel&#8217;s space? Or does he just think that Sam Brownback might have been on to something? In any case, Duncan Hunter found his prey and is attacking: &quot;Romney is absolutely wrong in recommending a secret timetable,&quot; Rep. Duncan Hunter, R-Calif., tells ABC News in a telephone interview while campaigning in Cedar Rapids, Iowa. &quot;Secret timetables are bad because in the end they all become public and the enemy uses them to estimate the limit on America&rsquo;s endurance.&quot; [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: eyeon08.com &#187; More thoughts on Diageo/Hotline poll: Security</title>
		<link>http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/01/12/explaining-brownback-on-the-war/#comment-1518</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 17:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/01/12/explaining-brownback-on-the-war/#comment-1518</guid>
					<description>[...] By coming out against the Surge, Sam Brownback is trying to shoot for that 19% that are opposed to the war. One could imagine that a group of those voters, combined with a good chunk of the 7% moral values and 5% religious/moral/family decline voters, could be a powerful voting block. Furthermore, an anti-surge GOP Presidential nominee will get a lot of free media as the issue moves through Congress. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] By coming out against the Surge, Sam Brownback is trying to shoot for that 19% that are opposed to the war. One could imagine that a group of those voters, combined with a good chunk of the 7% moral values and 5% religious/moral/family decline voters, could be a powerful voting block. Furthermore, an anti-surge GOP Presidential nominee will get a lot of free media as the issue moves through Congress. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.354 seconds -->
