<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Huckabee fundraising? Hype and spin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sorendayton.com/2006/12/28/huckabee-fundraising-hype-and-spin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sorendayton.com/2006/12/28/huckabee-fundraising-hype-and-spin/</link>
	<description>Merely an aggregation of a dispersed life online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 06:08:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: eyeon08.com &#187; Huckabee underperforms expectations&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://sorendayton.com/2006/12/28/huckabee-fundraising-hype-and-spin/comment-page-1/#comment-2105</link>
		<dc:creator>eyeon08.com &#187; Huckabee underperforms expectations&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2007 17:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeon08.com/2006/12/28/huckabee-fundraising-hype-and-spin/#comment-2105</guid>
		<description>[...] Now I have been harsh on Mike Huckabee&#8217;s fundraising in the past (here and here), but he is putting together a great team. The question for him has always been how he would do in fundraising. Under the theory of, if your numbers are bad, get them out early, he has put his numbers out before the buzzer. At a Washington fundraiser yesterday, he said: He said the first quarterly report for his presidential exploratory committee will show he has raised about $500,000, which he said was his goal. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Now I have been harsh on Mike Huckabee&#8217;s fundraising in the past (here and here), but he is putting together a great team. The question for him has always been how he would do in fundraising. Under the theory of, if your numbers are bad, get them out early, he has put his numbers out before the buzzer. At a Washington fundraiser yesterday, he said: He said the first quarterly report for his presidential exploratory committee will show he has raised about $500,000, which he said was his goal. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Right&#8217;s Field &#187; Huckabee&#8217;s Fundraising - and Website - Woes</title>
		<link>http://sorendayton.com/2006/12/28/huckabee-fundraising-hype-and-spin/comment-page-1/#comment-2104</link>
		<dc:creator>The Right&#8217;s Field &#187; Huckabee&#8217;s Fundraising - and Website - Woes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 16:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeon08.com/2006/12/28/huckabee-fundraising-hype-and-spin/#comment-2104</guid>
		<description>[...] At the time both I and Soren Dayton pointed out that Huckabee&#8217;s PAC fundraising was largely irrelevant to the presidential race. The money from his PAC is barred by from going towards any presidential campaign expenditures. Moreover, though the PAC can spend its money to support other candidates campaigns - effectively enabling Huckabee to buy endorsements from legislators in early primary states - the Hope for America PAC hasn&#8217;t spent any money supporting political candidates. None of the expenditures appeared to be a contribution to a political candidate, and the PAC had previously claimed on its Web site that supporting political candidates was its main purpose. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] At the time both I and Soren Dayton pointed out that Huckabee&#8217;s PAC fundraising was largely irrelevant to the presidential race. The money from his PAC is barred by from going towards any presidential campaign expenditures. Moreover, though the PAC can spend its money to support other candidates campaigns &#8211; effectively enabling Huckabee to buy endorsements from legislators in early primary states &#8211; the Hope for America PAC hasn&#8217;t spent any money supporting political candidates. None of the expenditures appeared to be a contribution to a political candidate, and the PAC had previously claimed on its Web site that supporting political candidates was its main purpose. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eyeon08.com &#187; So who gave money to Huckabee?</title>
		<link>http://sorendayton.com/2006/12/28/huckabee-fundraising-hype-and-spin/comment-page-1/#comment-2103</link>
		<dc:creator>eyeon08.com &#187; So who gave money to Huckabee?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 15:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeon08.com/2006/12/28/huckabee-fundraising-hype-and-spin/#comment-2103</guid>
		<description>[...] Earlier, I commented on the spin surrounding Mike Huckabee&#8217;s $500k fundraiser. As always happens with fundraising claims, the truth does come out: About&#160;27 people or entities accounted for&#160;roughly $450,000 of the total, At most 100 more people (and several couples were represented in that number) contributed the rest at $500 a head. This doesn&#8217;t strike fund-raisers I&#8217;ve spoken with as a broad or deep level of support from the hometown crowd. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Earlier, I commented on the spin surrounding Mike Huckabee&#8217;s $500k fundraiser. As always happens with fundraising claims, the truth does come out: About&nbsp;27 people or entities accounted for&nbsp;roughly $450,000 of the total, At most 100 more people (and several couples were represented in that number) contributed the rest at $500 a head. This doesn&#8217;t strike fund-raisers I&#8217;ve spoken with as a broad or deep level of support from the hometown crowd. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emboldened &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Huckabee&#8217;s Fundraising - and Website - Woes</title>
		<link>http://sorendayton.com/2006/12/28/huckabee-fundraising-hype-and-spin/comment-page-1/#comment-2102</link>
		<dc:creator>Emboldened &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Huckabee&#8217;s Fundraising - and Website - Woes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 14:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeon08.com/2006/12/28/huckabee-fundraising-hype-and-spin/#comment-2102</guid>
		<description>[...] At the time both I and Soren Dayton pointed out that Huckabee&#8217;s PAC fundraising was largely irrelevant to the presidential race. The money from his PAC is barred by from going towards any presidential campaign expenditures. Moreover, though the PAC can spend its money to support other candidates campaigns - effectively enabling Huckabee to buy endorsements from legislators in early primary states - the Hope for America PAC hasn&#8217;t spent any money supporting political candidates. None of the expenditures appeared to be a contribution to a political candidate, and the PAC had previously claimed on its Web site that supporting political candidates was its main purpose. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] At the time both I and Soren Dayton pointed out that Huckabee&#8217;s PAC fundraising was largely irrelevant to the presidential race. The money from his PAC is barred by from going towards any presidential campaign expenditures. Moreover, though the PAC can spend its money to support other candidates campaigns &#8211; effectively enabling Huckabee to buy endorsements from legislators in early primary states &#8211; the Hope for America PAC hasn&#8217;t spent any money supporting political candidates. None of the expenditures appeared to be a contribution to a political candidate, and the PAC had previously claimed on its Web site that supporting political candidates was its main purpose. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Right&#8217;s Field &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Dayton: Huckabee&#8217;s a Sham</title>
		<link>http://sorendayton.com/2006/12/28/huckabee-fundraising-hype-and-spin/comment-page-1/#comment-2101</link>
		<dc:creator>The Right&#8217;s Field &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Dayton: Huckabee&#8217;s a Sham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 16:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeon08.com/2006/12/28/huckabee-fundraising-hype-and-spin/#comment-2101</guid>
		<description>[...] Soren Dayton takes on the Huckabee&#8217;s A Fundraising God narrative in pretty convincing fashion. Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee held a fundraiser for his Hope for America PAC. It raised $500,000 from 350 people present, according to the blog of the Arkansas Republican Assembly. It got some good press and blog attention from Redstate, Kos, and others. But something is off here. And thatâ€™s why the Arkansas Times is unimpressed, calling it &#8220;puny&#8221; for a 10 year governor with many chits to collect on. Hereâ€™s why. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Soren Dayton takes on the Huckabee&#8217;s A Fundraising God narrative in pretty convincing fashion. Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee held a fundraiser for his Hope for America PAC. It raised $500,000 from 350 people present, according to the blog of the Arkansas Republican Assembly. It got some good press and blog attention from Redstate, Kos, and others. But something is off here. And thatâ€™s why the Arkansas Times is unimpressed, calling it &#8220;puny&#8221; for a 10 year governor with many chits to collect on. Hereâ€™s why. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
